expressindia.indianexpress.com
expressindia web
HomeBlogsCricketAstrology ShoppingTendersClassifieds Reader Comments
Font Size
Expressindia » Story

Can't direct suspension of MPs, MLAs chargesheeted for crimes against women: SC

PTI

Posted: Jan 04, 2013 at 1321 hrs IST
Supreme Court has declined to hear a plea for disqualification of MPs and MLAs chargesheeted for crime against women.

New Delhi The Supreme Court on Friday declined to hear a plea for disqualification of MPs and MLAs chargesheeted for crime against women but agreed to go into issues of fast track trial of rape cases and implementation of laws for safety of women.

The apex court, which was hearing two PILs filed after the December 16 gangrape incident, said it can only give notice to the government on limited issues as some of the prayers made in the petitions were beyond its jurisdiction.

"The issue of disqualification of MPs and MLAs is not in our jurisdiction," a Bench comprising Justices K S Radhakrishnan and Dipak Misra said.

"What is our power on MPs and MLAs. Obviously, such a sweeping relief can't be sought," the bench said referring to the prayer made for a direction for suspension of MPs and MLAs who have been chargesheeted for crime against women.

The Bench, during the hearing, suggested that the PIL petitioners should have taken a ground that if the investigation into the cases was not up to the mark, it should be treated as "misconduct" on the part of the Investigating Officer.

The Bench also asked the government to apprise it about the terms and references of Justice J S Verma committee which was set up to review and strengthen the existing law on rape and offences against women.

While the submission was made about the disqualification of politicians facing criminal cases, the Bench observed that without going into the status of a person in life, they should be put on fast track trial.

The Bench was told that out of 4,835 MPs and MLAs in the country, 1448 are facing criminal cases.

However, the Bench said at the moment it was not concerned with the issue and decided to hear the PIL on the limited issues.

The apex court also agreed that there was a need for fast track courts and additional judges.

"There is a lot of vacancies for the judges and lot of courts have to be set up," the bench remarked.

The court's observations came during hearing of the PILs filed by retired woman IAS officer Promilla Shanker and advocate and social activist Omika Dubey.

Shanker in her petition, apart from seeking suspension of MPs and MLAs charge-sheeted for crime against women, has also sought that cases of rape and crime against women and children be investigated by women police officials and trial be also conducted by lady judges.

In her plea, she has also said that no effort was being made for effective implementation of existing laws for safety of women.

Dubey in her plea, has sought directions for appointment of additional judges to adjudicate the matters of crime against women and for providing compulsory compensation to victims of rape.

She has also sought an order to restrain print and electronic media from publishing and telecasting obscene pictures of women.

Dubey has also raised issues of red light areas where girls are forced into prostitution.

The PILs were filed before the apex court days after the brutal gangrape and murder of a 23-year-old paramedical student in Delhi on December 16. The victim died in a Singapore hospital on December 29.

Print
 
Post Comments
Name* Email ID*
Subject* Country*
Message*
Characters remaining
 
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
I agree to the terms of use.
Lame Duck by N Kumar ACA ACS on 04 Jan 2013

If the countrys highest courtcant take a decison then who can or is it the realisation that tommorow they will also be caught in the act

How did SC chased 3G and CWG ministers and arrested them by raj on 04 Jan 2013

If supreme court is to be believed then how come the supreme court ordered enquiry and had the powerful central ministers all locked in jail for a year? What is going on CJI

If not SC then who else???????????????????????? by MK on 04 Jan 2013

Honarable supreme court if you donot have juridiction on what MP MLA doing then what is use of blaming investigation officer whos report is prepared under pressure. In such way no culprit will be punished and indian society suffer forever.

Latest News

Business

Showbiz

Sports

Defiant N Srinivasan refuses to quit: 'I have done no wrong... won't be bulldozed'...

First match was fixed, then Gurunath Meiyappan placed huge bets, say police

IPL final on schedule, no threat to Chennai Super Kings right now: BCCI source...

Rahul Dravid 'announces' retirement

Spot-fixing case: Police issues summons, but CSK CEO Meiyappan pleads for more time...

Phaneesh Murthy to be sued for sexually harassing iGate employee

Nawaz Sharif seeks civil nuclear technology from China

More
© The Indian Express Limited. All rights reserved
Advertise With Us | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Express Group | Site Map