expressindia.indianexpress.com
expressindia web
HomeBlogsCricketAstrology ShoppingTendersClassifieds Reader Comments
Font Size
Expressindia » Story

Rajesh Khanna’s ‘live-in partner’ files case against Dimple, Twinkle, Akshay

Express news service

Posted: Nov 09, 2012 at 0140 hrs IST
Anita Advani

Three months after actor Rajesh Khanna died, Anita Advani — who claims to have been his live-in partner for nearly a decade — has filed a domestic violence case against Khanna’s wife Dimple, their daughters Twinkle and Rinkie, and son-in-law and actor Akshay Kumar.

Magistrate S S Deshpande has asked the family to file their say on or before November 27. In a domestic violence case filed before the Bandra Magistrate court on Wednesday, Advani claimed that as she was Khanna’s live-in partner since 2003, she is entitled to his property. She also said she was forcibly evicted from his sprawling Carter Road residence Aashirwad.

Alleging that Khanna’s family manipulated the will, Advani sought protection under the Domestic Violence Act and re-entry into the house. In her application, she further stated that under Section 19 of the Act, the magistrate may, on being satisfied that domestic violence has taken place, pass a residence order restraining the respondent from “dispossessing or in any other manner disturbing the possession of the aggrieved person from the shared household whether or not the respondent has a legal or equitable interest in the shared household”, and that the family is guilty of evicting her from the house.

Advani’s lawyer Manohar Shetty said in case the court doesn’t help her get possession of the bungalow, she seeks Rs 50 crore compensation under Section 20 of the Act.

Advani is an entrepreneur and niece of former Philippines president Ferdinand Emmanuel Marcos.

Print
 
Post Comments
Name* Email ID*
Subject* Country*
Message*
Characters remaining
 
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
I agree to the terms of use.
Oops !! by Ejaz Khan on 09 Nov 2012

Its just a way to get fame nothing else, The Superstar has died and Anita got gready, So sad

LEGAL DISPOSSESSION THROUGH DV ACT by siff_member on 09 Nov 2012

DV ACT AWARENESS: 1) THE OWNER OF THE HOUSE CAN BE KICKED OUT OF THE HOUSE THROUGH A RESIDENCE ORDER FROM THE COURT WHILE HIS FEMALE PARTNER WOULD BE GIVEN THE RIGHT TO RESIDE THERE. 2) EVEN A LIVE IN PARTNER CAN FILE A CASE OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CASE AGAINST A MAN, HIS LEGAL WIFE AND OTHER MEMBERS OF THE FAMILY.

Live-in partner by Sudhir Goel on 09 Nov 2012

His family didn't do anything for me for the last 10 years so they don't deserve anything from him. Even if he wrote something in the last few days, he could have been coerced into giving it to them.

reply by vv on 09 Nov 2012

the main question here is that it is she who is claiming she was his partner. he never said she was anything more than a friend.so she was not his live in partner.

This lady is a gold digger by vv on 09 Nov 2012

This is a common situation , an old man dies and the housekeeper refuses to leave quietly demanding exhorbitant payout to depart. She is blackening her own name and reputation . If she is really president marcos neice she must behave better. she can prove nothing about anything and the millions of kaka's fans will not tolerate a single word against him . she must behave with respect for his memory. If she has been already been paid a salary for servies rendered then any further payment is purely a discretionary bonus to be dcided by the heirs. Kaka has willed the property to his dear daughters . There is no hanky panky here. kaka did not die intestate. so how can she claim anything? At best in fairness she can be paid some small amount if she is a genuine case.nthe great superstar rajesh khanna ji deserves to be respected and honoured in perpetuity and such nuisance creating people should be made to shut up and leave the stage.

Latest News

Business

Showbiz

Sports

1993 serial blasts case: Sanjay Dutt surrenders before TADA court

No arrest for posts on social sites without permission: Supreme Court

Olympic suspension could end in next 2 months: Sports Minister

Varun Gandhi hate speech case: Sting says witnesses forced to turn hostile

High Court orders setting up of medical board to examine Om Prakash Chautala...

Sanjay Dutt withdraws plea, set to surrender before TADA court tomorrow

BJP calls case against Kataria a conspiracy, says GoM on CBI an eyewash

More
© The Indian Express Limited. All rights reserved
Advertise With Us | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Express Group | Site Map