expressindia.indianexpress.com
expressindia web
HomeBlogsCricketAstrology ShoppingTendersClassifieds Reader Comments
Font Size
Expressindia » Story

Taxing super rich will hurt honest tax payers, says Yashwant Sinha

ENS Economic Bureau

Posted: Jan 18, 2013 at 0129 hrs IST

Mumbai Former finance minister and parliamentary standing committee on finance chairman Yashwant Sinha on Thursday said taxing the super rich was a bad idea since it would end up taxing the honest and salaried more. Prime Minister’s Economic Advisory Council Chairman C Rangarajan had recently in an interview to The Economic Times suggested that India can think of a higher tax rate on substantially high incomes.

“If the super rich are considered to be those with Rs 10 lakh taxable income in a year then you are reaching out to the upper crust of the middle class and not really reaching out to the HNIs (high networth individuals). If you increase the tax rate then even these will start going out and evade taxes,” Sinha told The Indian Express. He also spoke against inheritance tax, pointing out that he was the one who had abolished gift tax.

Sinha noted that tax rates are well settled and the government should not meddle with it. Pointing out that most of the HNIs and super rich are self employed, Sinha said that it is easy to catch the salaried individual but quite difficult when you deal with the self-employed. “So any such move will end up increasing tax on the honest tax payers,” he pointed out.

While the fiscal deficit is a growing concern for the economy, Sinha said the government can reduce its expenditure and that will be a proper thing to do. He, however, added the current finance minister may resort to unconventional methods. “He can postpone the fertiliser, food and oil subsidy and may save even up to 1 per cent of the GDP. He can reach out to corporates and say—pay higher advance tax and we will return it in the first quarter. The worst thing that he can do is that he will push some expenditure below the line as he had done in his earlier budgets.”

Print
 
Post Comments
Name* Email ID*
Subject* Country*
Message*
Characters remaining
 
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
I agree to the terms of use.
Of course Mr.Sinha, it is indeed very easy to catch the salaried person and quite difficult to nab the HNIs and the super-rich since the NHIs are the financers in your esteemed ENTERPRISE by Gaurav on 18 Jan 2013

A Question to these so-called people's Leaders: Do you guys even feel for the pathetic quality of life of your brothers and sisters? If no,then whats the point in this argument. But still I would like to carry on this debate for the best interest of our country. There has to be a BASE-LEVEL of Quality of life defined for every individual in this country. PPP (Purchasing Power Parity) is a more better index than GDP (Gross Domestic Product) or an illusionary Per Capita Income. Another imp. factor is the perception of quality of life which varies from homo sapien to homo sapien depending upon his/her level of EVOLUTION?. The fatso junior Ambani who might be sitting on the helipad of his sky-scrapper & eating a Pizza might think he is comparatively worse-off than Bill-Gates. And this eternal struggle of haves & have-nots influence the market forces to disturb the equilibrium and then so-called better-off 'POWERFUL' always thrive to safe-guard their status quo, as if they are IMMORTALS

Focus on the 97% non tax payers. by Ritesh on 18 Jan 2013

He is right in saying that the honest tax-payers will be affected. Govt. should focus instead on the non tax-payers. 97% population doesn't pay a penny as income-tax.

rama by rajesh on 18 Jan 2013

most stupid comment

Latest News

Business

Showbiz

Sports

BJP tears into UPA govt on 4th anniversary, says it lacks leadership

Sanjay Dutt shifted to Pune's Yerwada Jail

Sreesanth spent Rs 1.95L on clothes, bought friend BlackBerry, paid in cash: Police...

Jessica Lall murder: Actor Shayan Munshi, ballistic expert Manocha to face perjury tr...

India seeks access from US to 26/11 terror convicts Headley, Rana

India, China call for end to incursion issue, sign 8 deals to boost ties

Spot-Fixing: Sreesanth reveals bookies lured India players with cars, women

More
© The Indian Express Limited. All rights reserved
Advertise With Us | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Express Group | Site Map